Before we start with the official reason why Bilderburg was officially set up here is a brief list of interesting attendees to the conferences over the years, including dates:
UK
Gordon Brown (1991), current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
Paddy Ashdown (1989), former leader of the UK Liberal Democrats
Ed Balls (2001-2003), Economic Secretary to the Treasury 2006 - 2007
Tony Blair (1993), former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
William Hague (1998), former leader of the Conservative Party (UK), current Shadow Foreign Secretary
AUSTRALIA
Rupert Murdoch (1982, 1988)
USA
Keith B. Alexander (2008), current Director, National Security Agency & DIA
Hillary Clinton (1997), current US Senator, also attended the World Economic Forum, the Munich Conference on Security Policy, the Salzburg Global Seminar and the Renaissance Weekend. Member of the Democratic Leadership Council
Bill Clinton (1991),[5] former US President, 1993 - 2001
Condoleezza Rice (2008), current United States Secretary of State
David Rockefeller, original U.S. founding member, life member, and member of the Steering Committee (1954-
Donald Rumsfeld (1975, 2002), Secretary of Defense, 2001 - 2006
Paul Wolfowitz (1990, 1994-1998, 2008), former President of the World Bank
The original Bilderberg conference was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg, near Arnhem in The Netherlands, from May 29 to May 31, 1954. The meeting was initiated by several people, including Joseph Retinger, concerned about the growth of anti-Americanism in Western Europe, who proposed an international conference at which leaders from European countries and the United States would be brought together with the aim of promoting understanding between the cultures of United States of America and Western Europe.
GERMANY
Angela Merkel (2005), current Chancellor of Germany
SPAIN
Juan Carlos I de Borbón y Borbón (1989), King of Spain
Queen Sofía de Grecia (1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1995, 1996, 2000, 2003-2005), Queen of Spain, wife of Juan Carlos I, King of Spain
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Monday, December 29, 2008
Rallies against Israeli raids
Thousands of people have attended rallies to express anger at Israel's air raids on the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.
There have been protests in Indonesia, Iraq, Venezuela and Lebanon.
RIOT police were on standby in London today after pro-Palestinian demonstrators tried to storm the Israeli embassy.
Hundreds of officers clashed with hardcore protesters as they drove the demonstrators back from the building in Kensington.
Their anger had been fired by Israel's assault on Palestinian militant group Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
A dozen rioters were arrested as up to 2,000 tried to surround the embassy in Palace Green yesterday. Police closed off neighbouring streets for nearly six hours, resulting in traffic chaos.
Video of the protests can be found at this link: Protests against Israeli raids
There have been protests in Indonesia, Iraq, Venezuela and Lebanon.
RIOT police were on standby in London today after pro-Palestinian demonstrators tried to storm the Israeli embassy.
Hundreds of officers clashed with hardcore protesters as they drove the demonstrators back from the building in Kensington.
Their anger had been fired by Israel's assault on Palestinian militant group Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
A dozen rioters were arrested as up to 2,000 tried to surround the embassy in Palace Green yesterday. Police closed off neighbouring streets for nearly six hours, resulting in traffic chaos.
Video of the protests can be found at this link: Protests against Israeli raids
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Natan Sharansky - a member of Bilderberg
Natan Sharansky (Hebrew: נתן שרנסקי, Russian: Натан Щаранский, born Anatoly Borisovich Shcharansky (Russian: Анатолий Борисович Щаранский) on 20 January 1948) is a notable former Soviet dissident, Human rights activist, former Prisoner of Zion, Israeli politician and author.
In it, Sharansky argues that freedom is essential for security and prosperity, and every people and nation deserve to live free in a democratic society. Suggesting his "town square test", Sharansky argues that human rights, safety, and stability can only be assured by releasing people from their oppressors and turning them into free societies where each would have the freedom to express his opinion. Therefore, he concludes, the free world must insist of promoting democracy for oppressed people, instead of appeasing dictatorships and doing business with tyrant regimes,
I then explained why democracy was so crucial to international stability and security, why linkage had been so successful during the Cold War, and why the free world had betrayed its democratic principles at Oslo. I outlined my plan to help the Palestinians build a free society and help Israelis and Palestinians forge a lasting peace.[9]
Sharansky takes what many of his critics call a hardline position towards the Palestinians, arguing that there can never be peace between Israel and the Palestinians until the latter rid their society of terrorist groups like Hamas and of anti-Semitism. His critics see an incompatibility between his ardent Zionism and his commitment to the struggle for universal human rights and democracy.
In a recent Ha’aretz interview, he maintained the “Jews came here 3,000 years ago and this is the cradle of Jewish civilization. Jews are the only people in history who kept their loyalty to their identity and their land throughout the 2,000 years of exile, and no doubt that they have the right to have their place among nations—not only historically but also geographically. As to the Palestinians, who are the descendants of those Arabs who migrated in the last 200 years, they have the right, if they want, to have their own state... but not at the expense of the state of Israel.”
A Full list of Bilderberg attendees is available at the following link: Bilderberg Attendees
In it, Sharansky argues that freedom is essential for security and prosperity, and every people and nation deserve to live free in a democratic society. Suggesting his "town square test", Sharansky argues that human rights, safety, and stability can only be assured by releasing people from their oppressors and turning them into free societies where each would have the freedom to express his opinion. Therefore, he concludes, the free world must insist of promoting democracy for oppressed people, instead of appeasing dictatorships and doing business with tyrant regimes,
I then explained why democracy was so crucial to international stability and security, why linkage had been so successful during the Cold War, and why the free world had betrayed its democratic principles at Oslo. I outlined my plan to help the Palestinians build a free society and help Israelis and Palestinians forge a lasting peace.[9]
Sharansky takes what many of his critics call a hardline position towards the Palestinians, arguing that there can never be peace between Israel and the Palestinians until the latter rid their society of terrorist groups like Hamas and of anti-Semitism. His critics see an incompatibility between his ardent Zionism and his commitment to the struggle for universal human rights and democracy.
In a recent Ha’aretz interview, he maintained the “Jews came here 3,000 years ago and this is the cradle of Jewish civilization. Jews are the only people in history who kept their loyalty to their identity and their land throughout the 2,000 years of exile, and no doubt that they have the right to have their place among nations—not only historically but also geographically. As to the Palestinians, who are the descendants of those Arabs who migrated in the last 200 years, they have the right, if they want, to have their own state... but not at the expense of the state of Israel.”
A Full list of Bilderberg attendees is available at the following link: Bilderberg Attendees
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
"I'M SURE HIS NAME IS BARACK OBAMA"
"Yes it is Barack Obama , Big Paws - why did you ask?"
"It's just that when George Bush got into power he started playing lots of golf - infact that's what he was doing on holiday just before the attacks on 9/11"
"well Im sure lots of normal , probably jobless Americans will be happy to know that their future president has time to practise his golf whilst on holiday in Hawaii!"
"Hmmmm - any more harrassment from those Yellow Coats today?"
"Funny you should mention that but i had to go and do some messenger work etc today and the train I got on had the ticket inspectors get on - i was just about to get off the train, map in hand when one demanded i produce my monthly travelcard which is registered in my name and is on a microchipped oyster card - so i did yet again.... And then on the train home a British Transport Police Officer got on exactly where I was sitting - so I took a picture on my phone and emailed it to myself, but for some reason I haven't received it yet - probably tomorrow.."
"Well Jason"
"Yes Conckers"
"You knew this would start to happen "
"They started it - but they seem so desperate now to want it to stop - i heard one announcer at the station saying they were trying to stop public mutiny - but if they started to tell the truth about what they've tried to do and done, then maybe it would stop...until then"
"ROAR ON!!!"
Sunday, December 21, 2008
DEFINITE FLOOR FILLER
If you don't buy any other cd this year then you should invest in GODSKITCHEN THE ANTHEMS 2009 - CD 3 IS OUR FAVE EVEN THOUGH THE LISTINGS ON THE CD ARE WRONG - THE LISTINGS ON THE BOX ARE CORRECT - WORTH EVERY PENNY!!!
Website Address is GODSKITCHEN
Website Address is GODSKITCHEN
Monday, December 15, 2008
Fact Sheets: Privacy and surveillance
1. What is surveillance?
Surveillance is the monitoring of activities of an individual, group or groups of people. New opportunities for mass surveillance are opening up daily with high-speed, networked computers facilitating many of our everyday activities. Surveillance today may be carried out via the Internet, via telephone networks or via the data profiling of individuals. It is carried out for a variety of reasons - by the private sector for commercial ones (such as the protection of intellectual property rights), or by states for security reasons.
Surveillance may be:
Passive – this analyses the trails of information generated by people’s everyday activities. It usually focuses on patterns of activity and includes techniques such as:
* data profiling and dataveillance (often used for market research, direct marketing or political lobbying)
* online monitoring of internet activity (for example, through data communications, information or cookies to track information on which websites are visited by an individual)
* enforcing intellectual property rights (through embedded information which tracks an individual’s use of a particular software or online service)
Directed – this can usually only be used in certain circumstances relating to serious crime. It directly targets and monitors specific individuals. It includes techniques such as:
* tapping communications (including internet data);
* bugging places of work;
* monitoring or infiltrating activities and networks through human agents.
2. How is surveillance covered by law?
Directed surveillance is covered by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, and the Terrorism Act 2000. They update the powers of the state to tap communications and to infiltrate networks or organisations. These laws require that:
* any directed surveillance must be properly authorised by a person empowered to do so;
* this authorisation must be subjected to scrutiny to ensure that it was justified under the relevant law, and that it was correctly applied.
Some kinds of directed surveillance controls are enabled primarily through general powers given to the police to 'maintain order'. The use of surveillance in policing demonstrations is something of a grey area in terms of regulation; although the type of surveillance used does not necessarily target specific individuals, the Security Services Act 1996 and the Police Act 1997 state that concerted action by many people, even if in itself not illegal, may be investigated as 'serious crime'.
The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 strengthens the powers of the state to hold traffic data (see glossary). It also allows government departments to pool their information on terrorism and serious crime as part of their investigations.
Controls over the monitoring of communications data are less restrictive than those for directed surveillance. Communications data is accessible to local government agencies as well as the police or security services.
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Act widened the scope of powers for surveillance. It introduced a new requirement for telecommunications service providers to install special taps to facilitate blanket surveillance based around the automated collection of traffic data.
The RIP Act provides that communications data may be intercepted:
* in the interests of public safety;
* for the protection of public health;
* the collection of tax or charges payable to a government department; or
* for preventing death or injury.
It requires that message contents, on the other hand, should only be read in cases involving:
* national security;
* the prevention of serious crime;
* the protection of the ‘economic well-being’ of the UK.
The European Cybercrime Convention permits communications data to be routinely databased and held for many years and shared with other states that are signatories to the Convention.
Safeguards for the rights of individuals in terms of the use of their personal data come under data protection laws. The rights of individuals to privacy are defined by the Human Rights Act 1998, which implements the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 8 of the Convention states that:
* Everyone has the right to respect for his(/her) private and family life, his(/her) home and his(/her) correspondence.
* There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Under UK law, therefore, a person has no absolute privacy rights. They are all subject to the exceptions above, so there is a wide range of circumstances in which government and other bodies may argue for such exceptions to be made.
3. Does the use of electronic surveillance threaten civil liberties?
In situations where data has been used (even where information is erroneous) in a way that damages a person's private life, individuals have limited legal rights to prevent further disclosure or to seek redress for the damage caused.
Many Internet privacy activists believe that there may be significant cause for concern on the privacy implications in the use of, for example;
* data profiling;
* the growing number of software tools that can only be registered online;
* internet firewalls and cookies;
* communications traffic data which identifies the source of requests, names of files supplied, dates, times, etc. This can enable the generation of profiles of the activities of groups or individuals;
* the databasing and archiving of that information.
Surveillance is the monitoring of activities of an individual, group or groups of people. New opportunities for mass surveillance are opening up daily with high-speed, networked computers facilitating many of our everyday activities. Surveillance today may be carried out via the Internet, via telephone networks or via the data profiling of individuals. It is carried out for a variety of reasons - by the private sector for commercial ones (such as the protection of intellectual property rights), or by states for security reasons.
Surveillance may be:
Passive – this analyses the trails of information generated by people’s everyday activities. It usually focuses on patterns of activity and includes techniques such as:
* data profiling and dataveillance (often used for market research, direct marketing or political lobbying)
* online monitoring of internet activity (for example, through data communications, information or cookies to track information on which websites are visited by an individual)
* enforcing intellectual property rights (through embedded information which tracks an individual’s use of a particular software or online service)
Directed – this can usually only be used in certain circumstances relating to serious crime. It directly targets and monitors specific individuals. It includes techniques such as:
* tapping communications (including internet data);
* bugging places of work;
* monitoring or infiltrating activities and networks through human agents.
2. How is surveillance covered by law?
Directed surveillance is covered by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, and the Terrorism Act 2000. They update the powers of the state to tap communications and to infiltrate networks or organisations. These laws require that:
* any directed surveillance must be properly authorised by a person empowered to do so;
* this authorisation must be subjected to scrutiny to ensure that it was justified under the relevant law, and that it was correctly applied.
Some kinds of directed surveillance controls are enabled primarily through general powers given to the police to 'maintain order'. The use of surveillance in policing demonstrations is something of a grey area in terms of regulation; although the type of surveillance used does not necessarily target specific individuals, the Security Services Act 1996 and the Police Act 1997 state that concerted action by many people, even if in itself not illegal, may be investigated as 'serious crime'.
The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 strengthens the powers of the state to hold traffic data (see glossary). It also allows government departments to pool their information on terrorism and serious crime as part of their investigations.
Controls over the monitoring of communications data are less restrictive than those for directed surveillance. Communications data is accessible to local government agencies as well as the police or security services.
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Act widened the scope of powers for surveillance. It introduced a new requirement for telecommunications service providers to install special taps to facilitate blanket surveillance based around the automated collection of traffic data.
The RIP Act provides that communications data may be intercepted:
* in the interests of public safety;
* for the protection of public health;
* the collection of tax or charges payable to a government department; or
* for preventing death or injury.
It requires that message contents, on the other hand, should only be read in cases involving:
* national security;
* the prevention of serious crime;
* the protection of the ‘economic well-being’ of the UK.
The European Cybercrime Convention permits communications data to be routinely databased and held for many years and shared with other states that are signatories to the Convention.
Safeguards for the rights of individuals in terms of the use of their personal data come under data protection laws. The rights of individuals to privacy are defined by the Human Rights Act 1998, which implements the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 8 of the Convention states that:
* Everyone has the right to respect for his(/her) private and family life, his(/her) home and his(/her) correspondence.
* There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Under UK law, therefore, a person has no absolute privacy rights. They are all subject to the exceptions above, so there is a wide range of circumstances in which government and other bodies may argue for such exceptions to be made.
3. Does the use of electronic surveillance threaten civil liberties?
In situations where data has been used (even where information is erroneous) in a way that damages a person's private life, individuals have limited legal rights to prevent further disclosure or to seek redress for the damage caused.
Many Internet privacy activists believe that there may be significant cause for concern on the privacy implications in the use of, for example;
* data profiling;
* the growing number of software tools that can only be registered online;
* internet firewalls and cookies;
* communications traffic data which identifies the source of requests, names of files supplied, dates, times, etc. This can enable the generation of profiles of the activities of groups or individuals;
* the databasing and archiving of that information.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Obama wants Al Gore in govt..
CHICAGO (AP) President-elect Barack Obama on Tuesday praised former Vice President Al Gore's ideas on the environment as one part of helping the nation's struggling economy recovery.
Obama, Gore and Vice President-elect Joe Biden met privately at Obama's transition headquarters here for almost two hours. Obama said they discussed so-called green jobs as a way to boost employment across the country, improve national security by reducing reliance on foreign oil, and reduce energy costs.
Obama said global warming is "not only a problem, but it's also an opportunity."
"We all believe what the scientists have been telling us for years now, that this is a matter of urgency and national security, and it has to be dealt with in a serious way," Obama told reporters and photographers at the end of the closed-door meeting.
"We have the opportunity now to make jobs all across this country, in all 50 states, to repower America. ... We are not going to miss this opportunity," Obama said.
- Advertisement -
The president-elect's comments closely resembled Gore's plan for an environmental economy, outlined in a speech in July, and he echoed the title of Gore's effort, Repower America.
The president-elect's two guests did not speak to reporters.
Gore sought the presidency in 2000 but lost to then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush in a disputed election that was settled by the Supreme Court. He then became a leader in the movement to draw attention to climate change and global warming. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, and his documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Academy Award the same year.
He lends Obama instant credibility among environmental activists. Aides also said Obama didn't plan to recruit Gore to become a formal part of his administration.
Obama has pledged to use part of his proposed economic stimulus package to develop alternative energies and green technologies. Obama's aides said the private meeting would help shape the president-elect's economic policies.
In April, as Obama was fighting for the nomination, he lavished praise on the former vice president and said he would play a role in dealing with the environment.
"I will make a commitment that Al Gore will be at the table and play a central part in us figuring out how we solve this problem. He's somebody I talk to on a regular basis," Obama said in Pennsylvania. "I'm already consulting with him in terms of these issues, but climate change is real. It is something we have to deal with now, not 10 years from now, not 20 years from now."
At the time, Gore was one of the most coveted endorsements up for grabs as the primary narrowed to between Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton. Gore was vice president under President Bill Clinton, but remained out of the primary contests.
Friday, December 05, 2008
Canadian leader suspends Parliament to stay in power
(CNN) -- Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Thursday that Canada's governor general has allowed him to suspend Parliament, postponing a no-confidence vote from his opponents that he was likely to lose.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper says Parliament will resume on January 26.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper says Parliament will resume on January 26.
Harper called on his opponents to work with his government on measures to aid the nation's economy when Parliament returns on January 26.
"The first order of business will be the presentation of a federal budget," Harper told reporters outside the governor general's residence in Ottawa, Canada.
"Those who were elected here to serve the interest of Canada as a whole should work together -- at least to some degree -- on planning an economic plan for Canada."
Had Governor General Michaelle Jean -- who represents Britain's Queen Elizabeth II as head of state -- denied Harper's request, Monday's vote would have likely brought down Harper's government, less than two months after his Conservative Party strengthened its minority position in federal elections.
The Liberal Party and the leftist New Democratic Party announced plans earlier this week to form a governing coalition with the support of the Bloc Quebecois, which supports independence for French-speaking Quebec.
Liberal Party Leader Stephane Dion, the man who would fill Harper's role under the planned coalition, said the coalition would look to replace Harper unless he makes "monumental change."
"For the first time in the history of Canada, the prime minister of Canada is running away from the parliament of Canada," said Dion, accusing the premier of placing "partisan politics ahead of the interest of all Canadians."
New Democratic Party leader Jack Layton said Harper had used a "maneuver to escape accountability."
"He refuses to face the people of Canada through their elected representatives," he said. "The prime minister is choosing to protect his own job rather than focusing on the jobs of Canadians who are being thrown out of work today."
The news comes one day after Harper appealed directly to Canadians for support, vowing in a nationally televised address on the economy to halt his opponents, whom he accused of imposing their own agenda on the Canadian people.
"Unfortunately, even before the government has brought forward its budget, and only seven weeks after a general election, the opposition wants to overturn the results of that election," said the prime minister, whose Conservative Party strengthened its minority position in federal elections on October 14. iReport.com: Outrage brewing in Canada
Harper rejected the idea of a "power-sharing coalition with a separatist party," referring to the Bloc Quebecois, and insisted the country must stand together.
"At a time of global economic instability, Canada's government must stand unequivocally for keeping the country together. At a time like this, a coalition with the separatists cannot help Canada," he said Wednesday.
"The opposition is attempting to impose this deal without your say, without your consent, and without your vote. This is no time for backroom deals with the separatists; it is the time for Canada's government to focus on the economy and specifically on measures for the upcoming budget. This is a pivotal moment in our history," he said.
Harper, 49, has served as prime minister since February 2006.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Farm subsidies - lining the pockets of wealthy farmers eg. Rockefeller (Bilderburg)
Farm Subsidies - Lining the pockets of wealthy farm owners?
What do Ken Lay, Ted Turner, Sam Donaldson and David Rockefeller all have in common? asks Sacha Zimmerman in this months Reader's Digest.
Years of pocketing lots of money -- your money seems to be the answer.
Amazing as it sounds, your tax dollars have been going to rich guys like these in the form of farm subsidies. That's right, our government is paying big bucks to wealthy individuals who happen to own rural land somewhere, as long as they agree to federal rules about how -- and even whether -- they cultivate their spread.
From 1995 to 2005, Lay, the now-deceased Enron CEO, got $23,326 for conservation land in Missouri; business mogul Turner raked in $590,823 for farms in Nebraska, South Dakota, Montana and Florida; Donaldson supplemented his earnings as a broadcast journalist with $88,308 for a livestock ranch in New Mexico; and Rockefeller, a financier and philanthropist, got $553,782 for two farms in New York.
Appalled that your tax money is going to people who hardly need a handout? Well, it's worse than you think. According to a study by The Washington Post, since 2000 the government has paid people around the country $1.3 billion a year not to farm. That equates to 40 million acres annually -- "the equivalent of making every farm in Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana and Ohio idle," says Brian Riedl, a senior budget analyst at the Heritage Foundation.
And it's only a small part of the subsidy picture: In 2005 alone, 75 percent of the $20 billion in farm subsidies was paid to farmers for cultivating select crops like corn and soybeans. Among those soaking up the subsidies are well-to-do operators of large industrial farms. Meanwhile, the small, struggling farmer who may actually need assistance is getting squeezed out of business by the big boys lined up at the public trough.
What do Ken Lay, Ted Turner, Sam Donaldson and David Rockefeller all have in common? asks Sacha Zimmerman in this months Reader's Digest.
Years of pocketing lots of money -- your money seems to be the answer.
Amazing as it sounds, your tax dollars have been going to rich guys like these in the form of farm subsidies. That's right, our government is paying big bucks to wealthy individuals who happen to own rural land somewhere, as long as they agree to federal rules about how -- and even whether -- they cultivate their spread.
From 1995 to 2005, Lay, the now-deceased Enron CEO, got $23,326 for conservation land in Missouri; business mogul Turner raked in $590,823 for farms in Nebraska, South Dakota, Montana and Florida; Donaldson supplemented his earnings as a broadcast journalist with $88,308 for a livestock ranch in New Mexico; and Rockefeller, a financier and philanthropist, got $553,782 for two farms in New York.
Appalled that your tax money is going to people who hardly need a handout? Well, it's worse than you think. According to a study by The Washington Post, since 2000 the government has paid people around the country $1.3 billion a year not to farm. That equates to 40 million acres annually -- "the equivalent of making every farm in Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana and Ohio idle," says Brian Riedl, a senior budget analyst at the Heritage Foundation.
And it's only a small part of the subsidy picture: In 2005 alone, 75 percent of the $20 billion in farm subsidies was paid to farmers for cultivating select crops like corn and soybeans. Among those soaking up the subsidies are well-to-do operators of large industrial farms. Meanwhile, the small, struggling farmer who may actually need assistance is getting squeezed out of business by the big boys lined up at the public trough.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Darling & his Vat Petrol farce
BE WARNED: The London Papers and the news programmes this evening forgot to tell you this:
He increased petrol duty to help offset the effect of the VAT cut on fuel consumption. effectively cancelling out the effect of the VAT cut
Taken from: Financial Times : Darling plans tax hit to fund £20bn fiscal stimulus
By Jamie Chisholm
Published: November 24 2008 15:37 | Last updated: November 24 2008 18:02
He increased petrol duty to help offset the effect of the VAT cut on fuel consumption. effectively cancelling out the effect of the VAT cut
Taken from: Financial Times : Darling plans tax hit to fund £20bn fiscal stimulus
By Jamie Chisholm
Published: November 24 2008 15:37 | Last updated: November 24 2008 18:02
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Who in their right mind would want to work for MI6 anyway?
Read this article about Richard Tomlinson before you make up your mind
Arctic Loses Huge Ice Shelf, but Melt Isn't Expected to Exceed 2007 Record
In the summer of 2007, the Arctic melted to a record extent. It then refroze at a record pace in late October and November. The top image shows the ice in mid-November 2007 after refreezing; the bottom in mid-September, at its record low.
Photo: NASA Earth Observatory
A big ice shelf, eight square miles in size, has broken away near Ellesmere Island in the Canadian Arctic. It is the biggest ice shelf to deteriorate since 2005, according to Reuters.
The collapse leaves a once-vast ice shelf at just 11% of its original size. Once 3,500 square miles, it is now 400, and stands as one of many symbols of global warming's impact on the Earth's poles.
But overall, the Arctic is faring better than in 2007, when a record melt left vast stretches of open water in the once-icy north. Earlier predictions that the North Pole would become ice-free this summer seem to have been overly pessimistic, though the degree of melting is still well more than the long-term average.
The seasonal melting of Arctic sea ice is watched closely, because the Arctic has demonstrated the clearest signals of climate change's early impacts. What happens in the Arctic is seen as a harbinger for the dramatic changes that could be in store for lower latitudes.
If all the push-and-pull of scientific observation, prediction and analysis gets confusing, don't fret. Remember the overriding message that scientists agree to: Greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels is a significant cause of global warming, and climate change is already beginning to have real and negative effects on life on Earth. The consequences of failing to reduce carbon dioxide pollution will be more dramatic weather- and climate-related changes.
New President - same old Bull****?
British troops must not be sent in support of US President-Elect Barack Obama's planned "surge" in Afghanistan, the head of the armed forces has said.
Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of the Defence Staff, warned that the British military was already over-stretched, and suggested that troops from other Nato countries should be sent to fight.
Mr Obama has spoken of his desire to see a surge in troop numbers in Afghanistan, similar to that which appears to have had success against extremists in Iraq, to finally quell the Taliban insurgency.
But Sir Jock said that British troops were already struggling to cope with fighting in the two theatres of Iraq and Afghanistan, and could not take on more demands.
His words were echoed by David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, who agreed that other Nato countries should take responsibility for any fresh surge in Afghanistan.
Both men also ruled out sending British troops to the Congo to bolster the United Nations force in central Africa.
There are currently 8,100 military personnel serving Afghanistan, with another 4,100 in Iraq due to withdraw by the middle of next year.
Sir Jock said that they should not be redeployed to Afghanistan once their mission in Iraq ended, adding: "I am a little nervous when people use the word 'surge' as if this were some sort of panacea.
"We welcome more military force being sent to Afghanistan. Everybody needs to do their share, we are very clear on that.
"In the context of what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan, we are shouldering a burden which is more than we are able to shoulder in the long term, so we expect the others to take up their share of that burden."
Appearing with Sir Jock on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show, Mr Miliband was asked if Mr Obama's proposed surge would require an increase in the size of Britain's commitment there.
He said: "Not necessarily, no. As the second-largest contributor of troops in Afghanistan, the first thing we say is that we don't want to bear an unfair share of the burden."
William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, also warned that Britain was already making a "disproportionate contribution" to the Nato effort in Afghanistan.
He told Sky News' Sunday Live: "We do need the rest of Nato to play its part in Afghanistan and undoubtedly it seems that Barack Obama does intend to send larger US forces and that is part of what is necessary in Afghanistan.
"We would all take some persuading that there would have to be a much larger British contingent there - there's already a very large British contingent."
Meanwhile, Nick Clegg, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, has said that the Government should talk to Iranian and Taliban leaders in order to find lasting resolutions to the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He added: "Negotiation with both the Taliban and Iran may be unpalatable, but it is the only route to success, and if it doesn't happen now it will be too late."
Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of the Defence Staff, warned that the British military was already over-stretched, and suggested that troops from other Nato countries should be sent to fight.
Mr Obama has spoken of his desire to see a surge in troop numbers in Afghanistan, similar to that which appears to have had success against extremists in Iraq, to finally quell the Taliban insurgency.
But Sir Jock said that British troops were already struggling to cope with fighting in the two theatres of Iraq and Afghanistan, and could not take on more demands.
His words were echoed by David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, who agreed that other Nato countries should take responsibility for any fresh surge in Afghanistan.
Both men also ruled out sending British troops to the Congo to bolster the United Nations force in central Africa.
There are currently 8,100 military personnel serving Afghanistan, with another 4,100 in Iraq due to withdraw by the middle of next year.
Sir Jock said that they should not be redeployed to Afghanistan once their mission in Iraq ended, adding: "I am a little nervous when people use the word 'surge' as if this were some sort of panacea.
"We welcome more military force being sent to Afghanistan. Everybody needs to do their share, we are very clear on that.
"In the context of what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan, we are shouldering a burden which is more than we are able to shoulder in the long term, so we expect the others to take up their share of that burden."
Appearing with Sir Jock on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show, Mr Miliband was asked if Mr Obama's proposed surge would require an increase in the size of Britain's commitment there.
He said: "Not necessarily, no. As the second-largest contributor of troops in Afghanistan, the first thing we say is that we don't want to bear an unfair share of the burden."
William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, also warned that Britain was already making a "disproportionate contribution" to the Nato effort in Afghanistan.
He told Sky News' Sunday Live: "We do need the rest of Nato to play its part in Afghanistan and undoubtedly it seems that Barack Obama does intend to send larger US forces and that is part of what is necessary in Afghanistan.
"We would all take some persuading that there would have to be a much larger British contingent there - there's already a very large British contingent."
Meanwhile, Nick Clegg, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, has said that the Government should talk to Iranian and Taliban leaders in order to find lasting resolutions to the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He added: "Negotiation with both the Taliban and Iran may be unpalatable, but it is the only route to success, and if it doesn't happen now it will be too late."
Saturday, November 22, 2008
David Mayer de Rothschild - The environmentalist
David Mayer de Rothschild (born 25 August 1978) is a British adventurer and environmentalist, and head of Adventure Ecology, an expedition group raising awareness about climate change. He is the youngest of three children of Victoria Schott (born 1949) and Sir Evelyn de Rothschild (b. 1931) of the Rothschild banking family of England. His middle name "Mayer" is taken from the name of the founder of the Rothschild family banking empire, Mayer Amschel Rothschild.
* 1 Early life
* 2 Charity work
* 3 Adventurer
* 4 Literary work
* 5 References
* 6 External links
Early life
David de Rothschild earned a B.Sc (Honors) in Political Science and Information Systems from Oxford Brookes University, a public university in Oxford, England, and an advanced Diploma in Natural Medicine gained by distance learning. He started out as a businessman, establishing an apparel manufacturing and distributing company for licensed brands. His brother Anthony is Co-managing Director of A7 music and some of the apparel his operation produced was under license from musicians such as The Beatles.
Neither he nor his brother have shown interest in joining the family-owned N M Rothschild & Sons London banking business and when their father stepped down as chairman in 2003, cousin David René de Rothschild of the French branch of the family took over as head of the worldwide Rothschild Group.
Charity work
In 2003 David de Rothschild took up residency for a time in Sydney, Australia where he began writing a series of educational books for children and founded a naturopathic/ecological education center in New Zealand, with the additional goal buying an 1,100-acre (4 km2) farm he used to develop self-sufficient organic-farming techniques. Environmentally conscious, he is also the founder of "Sculpt the Future", a charitable organization that works with environmentally disadvantaged communities.
David founded Adventure Ecology whose stated goal is to promote a greater connection with the natural world through a series of high-profile expeditions. The first mission in the series "Top of the world" Mission 1 expedition began on March 4, 2006. The four-member team included de Rothschild and fellow Briton Martin Hartley, along with two Canadians, Paul Landry and his daughter Sarah McNair Landry. After 100 days traversing the Arctic Ocean from Russia To Canada, David de Rothschild become one of 42 people and the youngest British person to ever reach both geographical poles. David de Rothschild is a National Geographic "Emerging Explorer" for its class of 2007.[1] He was also recently made a "Young Global Leader" by the World Economic Forum.
Adventurer
A participant in a number of extreme competitions, de Rothschild won his age group in the Escape from Alcatraz triathlon. A friend of polar guide Paul Landry, he became involved with eco-adventure and was part of the team that, in June 2005, set a new record for the fastest crossing of the Greenland Icecap. He was a member of the 2004/2005 "Invesco Perpetual Trans-Antarctica Challenge", an expedition that made him the youngest Briton to cross the continent of Antarctica.
Literary work
David wrote the official Live Earth Global Warming Survival Handbook in 2007, featuring 77 tips to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.[2]
* 1 Early life
* 2 Charity work
* 3 Adventurer
* 4 Literary work
* 5 References
* 6 External links
Early life
David de Rothschild earned a B.Sc (Honors) in Political Science and Information Systems from Oxford Brookes University, a public university in Oxford, England, and an advanced Diploma in Natural Medicine gained by distance learning. He started out as a businessman, establishing an apparel manufacturing and distributing company for licensed brands. His brother Anthony is Co-managing Director of A7 music and some of the apparel his operation produced was under license from musicians such as The Beatles.
Neither he nor his brother have shown interest in joining the family-owned N M Rothschild & Sons London banking business and when their father stepped down as chairman in 2003, cousin David René de Rothschild of the French branch of the family took over as head of the worldwide Rothschild Group.
Charity work
In 2003 David de Rothschild took up residency for a time in Sydney, Australia where he began writing a series of educational books for children and founded a naturopathic/ecological education center in New Zealand, with the additional goal buying an 1,100-acre (4 km2) farm he used to develop self-sufficient organic-farming techniques. Environmentally conscious, he is also the founder of "Sculpt the Future", a charitable organization that works with environmentally disadvantaged communities.
David founded Adventure Ecology whose stated goal is to promote a greater connection with the natural world through a series of high-profile expeditions. The first mission in the series "Top of the world" Mission 1 expedition began on March 4, 2006. The four-member team included de Rothschild and fellow Briton Martin Hartley, along with two Canadians, Paul Landry and his daughter Sarah McNair Landry. After 100 days traversing the Arctic Ocean from Russia To Canada, David de Rothschild become one of 42 people and the youngest British person to ever reach both geographical poles. David de Rothschild is a National Geographic "Emerging Explorer" for its class of 2007.[1] He was also recently made a "Young Global Leader" by the World Economic Forum.
Adventurer
A participant in a number of extreme competitions, de Rothschild won his age group in the Escape from Alcatraz triathlon. A friend of polar guide Paul Landry, he became involved with eco-adventure and was part of the team that, in June 2005, set a new record for the fastest crossing of the Greenland Icecap. He was a member of the 2004/2005 "Invesco Perpetual Trans-Antarctica Challenge", an expedition that made him the youngest Briton to cross the continent of Antarctica.
Literary work
David wrote the official Live Earth Global Warming Survival Handbook in 2007, featuring 77 tips to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.[2]
Friday, November 21, 2008
Four at-risk children die from abuse every week
From The Times
November 20, 2008
Up to four children die each week in England from abuse or neglect, according to official figures that reveal the alarming scale of the problem.
The damning report by Ofsted makes clear that the death of Baby P was far from an isolated tragedy. It found that 282 vulnerable children – many of them already known to social services – died in the 17-month period to the end of August. A further 136 suffered serious harm or injury.
Two thirds of those killed or hurt were babies less than a year old.
Children’s charities had previously estimated that one child died from cruelty each week.
It is the first time that Ofsted, which regulates children’s services in England, has examined the issue of children at risk. Its findings suggest that hundreds of abused children are at risk because councils are failing to learn promptly from previous deaths.
The report was presented yesterday by Ofsted’s chief inspector, Christine Gilbert. She said: “We are still not learning enough – or fast enough – from serious case reviews which happen when a child has died or been harmed through neglect or abuse.”
She referred to “recent tragic events in Haringey, and Manchester”, where two boys were murdered last week. Their mother has been sectioned under the Mental Health Act. On Baby P she said: “I wish I could guarantee something so tragic couldn’t happen again, but I can’t. Although there have been improvements in the past few years, there is absolutely no room for complacency: everyone involved in child protection in any way must take stock of the role they play.”
Ofsted said that of 92 case reviews it had evaluated since April last year, 32 were judged to be inadequate. Only 20 were considered good. One review supposed to last four months had taken four years, Ms Gilbert said. Ofsted is expected publish a detailed report into 50 serious case reviews this month.
Tim Loughton, the Shadow Children’s Minister, said: “The figures for the number of child deaths given in this report are alarmingly high. Despite the avalanche of child protection legislation and reorganisations of social services departments, the underlying problem is no less diminished.”
David Laws, the Liberal Democrats’ children’s spokesman, said: “This report makes some deeply concerning criticisms of child protection services. It is now all too clear that the lessons of the Victoria Climbié case have not been learnt.”
Yesterday Sabah al-Zayyat, the doctor accused of failing to spot Baby P’s broken back and eight broken ribs, said that she had been deeply affected by the circumstances of his death.
November 20, 2008
Up to four children die each week in England from abuse or neglect, according to official figures that reveal the alarming scale of the problem.
The damning report by Ofsted makes clear that the death of Baby P was far from an isolated tragedy. It found that 282 vulnerable children – many of them already known to social services – died in the 17-month period to the end of August. A further 136 suffered serious harm or injury.
Two thirds of those killed or hurt were babies less than a year old.
Children’s charities had previously estimated that one child died from cruelty each week.
It is the first time that Ofsted, which regulates children’s services in England, has examined the issue of children at risk. Its findings suggest that hundreds of abused children are at risk because councils are failing to learn promptly from previous deaths.
The report was presented yesterday by Ofsted’s chief inspector, Christine Gilbert. She said: “We are still not learning enough – or fast enough – from serious case reviews which happen when a child has died or been harmed through neglect or abuse.”
She referred to “recent tragic events in Haringey, and Manchester”, where two boys were murdered last week. Their mother has been sectioned under the Mental Health Act. On Baby P she said: “I wish I could guarantee something so tragic couldn’t happen again, but I can’t. Although there have been improvements in the past few years, there is absolutely no room for complacency: everyone involved in child protection in any way must take stock of the role they play.”
Ofsted said that of 92 case reviews it had evaluated since April last year, 32 were judged to be inadequate. Only 20 were considered good. One review supposed to last four months had taken four years, Ms Gilbert said. Ofsted is expected publish a detailed report into 50 serious case reviews this month.
Tim Loughton, the Shadow Children’s Minister, said: “The figures for the number of child deaths given in this report are alarmingly high. Despite the avalanche of child protection legislation and reorganisations of social services departments, the underlying problem is no less diminished.”
David Laws, the Liberal Democrats’ children’s spokesman, said: “This report makes some deeply concerning criticisms of child protection services. It is now all too clear that the lessons of the Victoria Climbié case have not been learnt.”
Yesterday Sabah al-Zayyat, the doctor accused of failing to spot Baby P’s broken back and eight broken ribs, said that she had been deeply affected by the circumstances of his death.
A list of stores permanently closing in the USA
Didn't take the time to check ALL of these to see if they are actually closing for sure, so I am just passing it on just in case you might have one of these store's gift cards - you may want to use it soon.
Circuit City stores... 150 stores closed
Ann Taylor- 117 stores nationwide are to be shuttered
Lane Bryant,, Fashion Bug ,and Catherine's to close 150 store nationwide
Eddie Bauer to close stores 27 stores and more after January
Cache will close all stores
Talbots closing down all stores
J. Jill closing all stores
GAP closing 85 stores
Footlocker closing 140 stores more to close after January
Wickes Furniture closing down
Levitz closing down remaining stores
Bombay closing remaining stores
Zales closing down 82 stores and 105 after January.
Whitehall closing all stores
Piercing Pagoda closing all stores
Disney closing 98 stores and will close more after January.
Home Depot closing 15 stores 1 in NJ (New Brunswick)
Macy's to close 9 stores after January
Linens and Things closing all stores
Movie Galley Closing all stores
Pacific Sunware closing stores
Pep Boys Closing 33 stores
Sprint/ Nextel closing 133 stores
JC Penney closing a number of stores after January
Ethan Allen closing down 12 stores.
Wilson Leather closing down all stores
Sharper Image closing down all stores
K B Toys closing 356 stores
Loews to close down some stores
Dillard's to close some stores.
Circuit City stores... 150 stores closed
Ann Taylor- 117 stores nationwide are to be shuttered
Lane Bryant,, Fashion Bug ,and Catherine's to close 150 store nationwide
Eddie Bauer to close stores 27 stores and more after January
Cache will close all stores
Talbots closing down all stores
J. Jill closing all stores
GAP closing 85 stores
Footlocker closing 140 stores more to close after January
Wickes Furniture closing down
Levitz closing down remaining stores
Bombay closing remaining stores
Zales closing down 82 stores and 105 after January.
Whitehall closing all stores
Piercing Pagoda closing all stores
Disney closing 98 stores and will close more after January.
Home Depot closing 15 stores 1 in NJ (New Brunswick)
Macy's to close 9 stores after January
Linens and Things closing all stores
Movie Galley Closing all stores
Pacific Sunware closing stores
Pep Boys Closing 33 stores
Sprint/ Nextel closing 133 stores
JC Penney closing a number of stores after January
Ethan Allen closing down 12 stores.
Wilson Leather closing down all stores
Sharper Image closing down all stores
K B Toys closing 356 stores
Loews to close down some stores
Dillard's to close some stores.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
UK Public Sector Debt (Official statistics - govt stats)
Public Sector
October: £1.0bn current budget surplus
These are graphs showing Public Sector Finance:
In October 2008, the public sector showed a surplus on current budget of £1.0 billion, compared with a surplus of £4.0 billion in October 2007.
Concentrating on one month in isolation can give a distorted picture as movements can be erratic. Focusing on the financial year to date generally provides a better overview. Between April 2008 and October 2008 of the financial year 2008/09, the public sector recorded a deficit of £23.3 billion. At the same stage of the 2007/08 financial year, a deficit of £9.5 billion had been recorded.
More generally, the public sector recorded deficits between 1991/92 and 1997/98 before moving into surplus in 1998/99. Deficits have been recorded since 2002/03.
An alternative measure of the public sector fiscal position is public sector net borrowing. This additionally takes account of capital investment. In October 2008, there was net borrowing of £1.4 billion, which compares with borrowing of £-1.8 billion in October 2007. The Budget forecast for 2008/09 is net borrowing of £43.0 billion.
Public sector net debt, expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), was 42.9 per cent at the end of October 2008, compared with 42.6 per cent at end of October 2007. Debt peaked at 44.2 per cent of GDP in 1997, its highest since the mid-1980s. The debt ratio then fell steadily as public sector finances improved, reaching a low of 29.1 per cent in February 2002. Since then it has risen. The Budget forecast for the end of March 2009 is 38.5 per cent.
Net debt was £640.9 billion at the end of October, compared with £607.1 billion a year earlier. The Budget forecast for net debt at the end of March 2009 is £581 billion.
Public sector net debt (excluding Northern Rock)
The most recent figures for public sector net debt excluding Northern Rock are for September 2008, when net debt was £563.1 billion (37.8 per cent of GDP).
October: £1.0bn current budget surplus
These are graphs showing Public Sector Finance:
In October 2008, the public sector showed a surplus on current budget of £1.0 billion, compared with a surplus of £4.0 billion in October 2007.
Concentrating on one month in isolation can give a distorted picture as movements can be erratic. Focusing on the financial year to date generally provides a better overview. Between April 2008 and October 2008 of the financial year 2008/09, the public sector recorded a deficit of £23.3 billion. At the same stage of the 2007/08 financial year, a deficit of £9.5 billion had been recorded.
More generally, the public sector recorded deficits between 1991/92 and 1997/98 before moving into surplus in 1998/99. Deficits have been recorded since 2002/03.
An alternative measure of the public sector fiscal position is public sector net borrowing. This additionally takes account of capital investment. In October 2008, there was net borrowing of £1.4 billion, which compares with borrowing of £-1.8 billion in October 2007. The Budget forecast for 2008/09 is net borrowing of £43.0 billion.
Public sector net debt, expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), was 42.9 per cent at the end of October 2008, compared with 42.6 per cent at end of October 2007. Debt peaked at 44.2 per cent of GDP in 1997, its highest since the mid-1980s. The debt ratio then fell steadily as public sector finances improved, reaching a low of 29.1 per cent in February 2002. Since then it has risen. The Budget forecast for the end of March 2009 is 38.5 per cent.
Net debt was £640.9 billion at the end of October, compared with £607.1 billion a year earlier. The Budget forecast for net debt at the end of March 2009 is £581 billion.
Public sector net debt (excluding Northern Rock)
The most recent figures for public sector net debt excluding Northern Rock are for September 2008, when net debt was £563.1 billion (37.8 per cent of GDP).
Bush sells off the desert to oil company
Gale Norton has to be happy. In 2003, Ms. Norton, then President Bush’s secretary of the interior (and now a senior oil executive at Royal Dutch Shell), struck a deal with the governor of Utah that would open about 3 million pristine acres of federal land to oil and gas drilling.
Environmental groups and the courts managed to keep the drillers at bay. No longer. In the last few days, the Bureau of Land Management has completed six long-range management plans for Utah that will expose these acres (and as many as 6 million more) to some form of commercial exploitation.
On Tuesday, the bureau announced that it would soon begin selling oil and gas leases — essentially the right to drill — in some of the most beautiful and fragile areas.
Conservationists are aghast, and rightly so. Apparently without consulting the National Parks Service, one of its sister agencies at the Interior Department, the bureau plans to auction more than two dozen leases adjacent to Arches National Park and very close to Canyonlands National Park, risking the parks’ air and water.
Also on the auction block, among other rare and spectacular vistas, is Desolation Canyon, so named by the explorer John Wesley Powell in 1869 while he traveled down the Green River to the Grand Canyon.
This sort of pillage would be hard to justify even if Utah’s reserves were large enough to make a difference, which they are not. The Energy Information Administration says that Utah has 2.5 percent of the country’s known natural gas reserves and less than 1 percent of its known oil reserves. And even if those reserves were worth going after, it would still be essential to protect areas of special cultural, scenic and recreational value.
The Interior Department’s writ is to manage the public lands for “multiple uses,” a difficult and ambiguous task. The Clinton administration issued many leases but tried hard to balance the competing claims of commerce and nature; the Bush administration heard only the voice of Vice President Dick Cheney and his one-sided mantra of “drill now, drill everywhere.”
This is but the latest of President Bush’s last-minute assaults on the environment. The incoming Obama administration will have to quickly review and reverse these decisions or find ways to mitigate the damage.
New York Times
Environmental groups and the courts managed to keep the drillers at bay. No longer. In the last few days, the Bureau of Land Management has completed six long-range management plans for Utah that will expose these acres (and as many as 6 million more) to some form of commercial exploitation.
On Tuesday, the bureau announced that it would soon begin selling oil and gas leases — essentially the right to drill — in some of the most beautiful and fragile areas.
Conservationists are aghast, and rightly so. Apparently without consulting the National Parks Service, one of its sister agencies at the Interior Department, the bureau plans to auction more than two dozen leases adjacent to Arches National Park and very close to Canyonlands National Park, risking the parks’ air and water.
Also on the auction block, among other rare and spectacular vistas, is Desolation Canyon, so named by the explorer John Wesley Powell in 1869 while he traveled down the Green River to the Grand Canyon.
This sort of pillage would be hard to justify even if Utah’s reserves were large enough to make a difference, which they are not. The Energy Information Administration says that Utah has 2.5 percent of the country’s known natural gas reserves and less than 1 percent of its known oil reserves. And even if those reserves were worth going after, it would still be essential to protect areas of special cultural, scenic and recreational value.
The Interior Department’s writ is to manage the public lands for “multiple uses,” a difficult and ambiguous task. The Clinton administration issued many leases but tried hard to balance the competing claims of commerce and nature; the Bush administration heard only the voice of Vice President Dick Cheney and his one-sided mantra of “drill now, drill everywhere.”
This is but the latest of President Bush’s last-minute assaults on the environment. The incoming Obama administration will have to quickly review and reverse these decisions or find ways to mitigate the damage.
New York Times
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Bank of China eyes HBOS bid
The Bank of China has emerged as a potential bidder for an alternative takeover of HBOS, it is reported.
The BBC said the bank was in "early talks" with former HBOS executive Jim Spowart and investment company European American Capital over a possible counter bid to the proposed takeover by Lloyds TSB.
Lloyds TSB says it will be able to deliver annual cost savings of more than £1.5 billion by the end of 2011 through its deal.
But there are fears it could lead to widespread job losses at the would-be combined banking giant.
Mr Spowart refused to confirm the report that the Bank of China was the potential backer.
He told The Scotsman: "We took a decision early on to neither confirm or deny which bank was behind any potential bid."
The report emerged as a former bank chief insisted the current offer by Lloyds TSB was "no longer the best deal".
Sir George Mathewson, ex-chief executive of Royal Bank of Scotland, is trying to convince shareholders they will not benefit from the Lloyds deal.
It emerged at the weekend that he and former HBOS chief executive Sir Peter Burt were seeking to oust the current chairman and chief executive in a move to thwart the Government-backed bid.
It has been resisted by HBOS which said Lloyds TSB offered "certainty".
Sunday, November 09, 2008
Peter Gabriel Family Snapshot Live 1986
The story of the song most resembles the JFK assasination but don't write that off as being the only objective of the lyrics. Gov. Wallace is part of it also. Gabriel is really illustrating the fanatical assasin's personality disorder which leads him to this disasterous event. Gabriel offers the explanation- the murderer's deep sense of emptiness and neglect as a result of his upbringing; and how his childhood was so deprived of attention and affection, that a personality was created who only saw the world from the outside looking in. The assasin needed this crime, be it on a political figure or celebrity, to make himself exist in a world he never felt a part of. To think some people write songs about holding hands.
- Patrick, NY, NY
Thursday, November 06, 2008
BANK OF ENGLAND CUTS BASE RATE BY 1.5% to 3%
Last time the Bank of England cut the Base Rate My savings account I have with ING Direct immediately had it's interest rate reduced - Now surely if The Bank of England cuts base rates below the rate of inflation surely this is exactly the same as blatantly saying that even money is becoming valueless?!!!
Monday, November 03, 2008
How much the UK Govt makes every year from the petrol pumps
There are 159 litres in a barrel of oil
Going on a price of $60 per barrel.....
a litre therefore costs 0.37$ per litre (1.6$/£)......
Therefore 23 p per litre goes to the Supplier when Petrol is £1 per litre....
7 p per litre goes to the Petrol Stations / oil refineries......
The Government charges (per litre):
53p TAX = 70 p TAX
17p VAT
The USA consumes 21 million barrels a day and has a population of 301 million people. Therefore if the Uk population consumes roughly the same proportion a day then that equates to 4 million barrels a day
So Govt tax = 4million x 159 litres x 0.7 x 365(days)= £163 billion tax a year
Going on a price of $60 per barrel.....
a litre therefore costs 0.37$ per litre (1.6$/£)......
Therefore 23 p per litre goes to the Supplier when Petrol is £1 per litre....
7 p per litre goes to the Petrol Stations / oil refineries......
The Government charges (per litre):
53p TAX = 70 p TAX
17p VAT
The USA consumes 21 million barrels a day and has a population of 301 million people. Therefore if the Uk population consumes roughly the same proportion a day then that equates to 4 million barrels a day
So Govt tax = 4million x 159 litres x 0.7 x 365(days)= £163 billion tax a year
Arab money on way to help IMF
Gordon Brown predicted "The Saudis will, I think. contribute - so we can have a bigger fund worldwide."
A Senior government source said the Saudis had been concerned about becoming a "milch cow" to prop up "Basket case" economies aound the world
A Senior government source said the Saudis had been concerned about becoming a "milch cow" to prop up "Basket case" economies aound the world
Friday, October 31, 2008
Is The US Dollar being artificially propped up to protect certain countries investments?
Some people are saying that The US is having the dollar artificially propped up to protect investments from other countries...
Here's a yahoo question from a couple of months ago...
What American Bank does Saudi Arabia own?
They do not own 100% of any US bank at this time however,Chase Manhattan Bank is participating in the new Saudi Arabian Investment Bank along with Japanese and European banks. The Saudis own 60 percent of this institution. There is also ownership in Chase, merril lynch, and many other investment companies.
They own a 60% interest in Citibank, as Saudi American bank-
Samba Financial Group was formed pursuant to Royal Decree dated 26/3/1400 H. (February 12, 1980), to take over the then existing branches of Citibank, N.A. in Jeddah and Riyadh, which were opened in 1955 and 1966 respectively. Samba was formed in accordance with a program adopted by the Kingdom in the mid-1970s, under which all foreign banks were required to sell majority equity interests to Saudi nationals. Samba commenced business on February 12, 1980 and closed its first fiscal year on December 31, 1980. The US part of citibank owns only 20% of the corporation.
Source(s):
http://www.samba.com/ENGLISH/Common/HTML...
Here's a yahoo question from a couple of months ago...
What American Bank does Saudi Arabia own?
They do not own 100% of any US bank at this time however,Chase Manhattan Bank is participating in the new Saudi Arabian Investment Bank along with Japanese and European banks. The Saudis own 60 percent of this institution. There is also ownership in Chase, merril lynch, and many other investment companies.
They own a 60% interest in Citibank, as Saudi American bank-
Samba Financial Group was formed pursuant to Royal Decree dated 26/3/1400 H. (February 12, 1980), to take over the then existing branches of Citibank, N.A. in Jeddah and Riyadh, which were opened in 1955 and 1966 respectively. Samba was formed in accordance with a program adopted by the Kingdom in the mid-1970s, under which all foreign banks were required to sell majority equity interests to Saudi nationals. Samba commenced business on February 12, 1980 and closed its first fiscal year on December 31, 1980. The US part of citibank owns only 20% of the corporation.
Source(s):
http://www.samba.com/ENGLISH/Common/HTML...
Monday, October 27, 2008
PM 'used crony to fix nuclear power inquiry'
Government accused of driving through energy policy by using slanted study
By Ben Russell, Home Affairs Correspondent The Independent
Saturday, 18 October 2008
Sizewell B in Suffolk, one of the plants at the forefront of nuclear power
A public consultation on new nuclear power stations which was run by a company linked to the Prime Minister's personal pollster has been criticised for breaching industry guidelines.
Environmentalists and opposition MPs denounced the exercise as "fixed" after the Market Research Standards Board said some material given to focus groups was "inaccurately or misleadingly presented".
The Conservatives accused ministers of "gerrymandering" and attack-ed them for employing Opinion Leader to run the project, a consultancy linked to Gordon Brown's personal pollster Deborah Mattinson. Opinion Leader runs the Government's citizens' juries and was awarded almost £1m of Treasury contracts when he was Chancellor. Ms Mattinson stood down as the company's joint chairman last year to work for Labour but remains a senior figure in its parent company.
The Market Research Standards Board said: "Information was inaccurately or misleadingly presented, or was imbalanced, which gave rise to a material risk of respondents being led towards a particular answer."
Greenpeace denounced the consul-tation as "a sham and an insult to the people who took part" claiming it would leave the Government's plans in disarray. Examples included focus groups being given material colouring nuclear and renewable power green, with blue for coal oil and gas.
Opinion Leader argued that the standards board was not competent to judge its methods and insisted Ms Mattinson played no part.
The ruling was the second time the Government's attempts to consult the public on new nuclear power stations faced criticism. The first consultation in 2006 had to be repeated after it was condemned by the High Court.
Greg Clark, the shadow energy minister, said: "These revelations call into question for a second time the way the Government is managing its nuclear policy. The standards watchdog for market research has decided that supposedly independent research was biased to give the answer the Government wanted." Steve Webb, the Liberal Democrat energy spokesman, added: "This ruling shows that the Government isn't even competent enough to rig its own consultation. It was hardly a secret that ministers had made their decision before their first consultation on new nuclear power."
Downing Street insisted the ruling would have no bearing on Britain's nuclear power programme. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "The outcome of the consultation stands, whatever the view of the Market Research Standards Board."
Viki Cooke, chief executive of Opinion Leader, said: "We do not accept the MRS ruling, which we believe to be incorrect. We do not believe that the MRS – a market research trade body – is competent to assess these new forms of deliberative engagement.
"Opinion Leader is not anybody's pet pollster. It does absolutely no political work whatsoever."
Friday, October 17, 2008
Indian activist: Massacre of Christians planned in advance
by Nirmala Carvalho
Lenin Raghuvanshi has visited Orissa as a member of a fact-finding team established by the European commission for the prevention of torture. Hindu radicals have a program for expunging Christians from the region and reconverting tribals and pariahs to Hinduism.
Bhubaneshwar (AsiaNews) - The campaign of attacks against Christians in Orissa was planned for months. This is the claim of Lenin Raghuvanshi, director of the People's Vigilance Committee on Human Rights. Mr. Raghuvanshi visited Orisa as part of of a fact-finding team for the European commission for the prevention of torture.
Speaking to AsiaNews, he says that "In the Kandhamal district, it is very clear that a cleansing of marginalized Christian populace is taking place by RSS, BajrangDal and VHP cadres (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Bajrang Dal, Vishwa Hindu Parishad)."
The wave of violence has so far killed 61 people, injured 18,000, destroyed 4,500 homes, and burned and razed 181 churches. It was apparently motivated by the killing of Swami Laxamananda Saraswati, a leader of the VHP, last August 23. He was killed by a group of Maoists, but Hindu fundamentalist groups immediately accused the Christians of the assassination.
"In fact, on August 14," Raghuvanshi explains, "nearly 10 days before the death of Swami Laxamanada, a mob of RSS people came to Sahasipudar village and threatened the people of the perils of following the Christian faith . These extremists also warned the margnisalised Christian community that henceforth the Gita [editor's note: one of the sacred books of Hinduism] was their sacred book."
In Orissa, campaigns to reconvert Christian tribals and pariahs back to Hinduism date back for decades. The swami killed in August was himself a fierce promoter of this. Last December, on Christmas eve, he was the one who had pushed for new attacks against Christians, in which 13 homes were burned and 3 people killed, while thousands of faithful were forced to flee.
"After the December anti-Christian violence," Raghuvanshi says, "three families converted to Hinduism out of fear. It is most unfortunate, in a broken down church the picture of Swami Laxamandanda has been installed."
Mr. Lenin Raghuvanshi recently won the “Acha Peace Star” prize for his efforts for reconciliation among communities in India. Commenting further on the violence in Orissa and on his work with the fact-finding mission, he says: "We were witnesses to most deplorable and inhuman atrocities, most probably, these fundamentalists forces are whipping up communal frenzy with a view to the state elections scheduled next year. Here elections are won at the cost of human lives - how much lower can humanity stoop?"
Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Mobile phone virus spreads by MMS
mobile phone virus with the potential of spreading globally through MMS has been identified. According to security firm F-Secure, CommWarrior can spread by sending messages to contacts listed in the infected phone's address book.
Until now mobile phone viruses have only been able to replicate locally, by using Bluetooth wireless technology.
CommWarrior, which attacks Symbian Series 60 platform phones, is able to do this too, but in a critical evolution in phone viruses, now also has the ability to randomly send an MMS (multimedia messaging service) message to an infected phone's contacts list.
Users must download a file sent with the text in order to infect their phone.
This ability is similar to that seen in e-mail viruses, where the virus replicates by sending itself to e-mail addresses listed in the infected PC's address book. Users are much more likely to open these e-mails, as they often appear to have been sent by someone they know.
"The situation is not critical since we have not received a lot of reports from our customers," said F-Secure's Director for Mobile Operator Solutions, Antti Vihavainen. "However, CommWarrior creates unwanted billing for the owners of infected phones by sending MMS messages without user interaction."
"The phones can be easily protected by using common sense. None of today's mobile viruses can install themselves without the user accepting the standard security warnings," he added.
F-Secure is investigating why the virus, which appears to have come from Russia, is replicating slowly at present.
Until now mobile phone viruses have only been able to replicate locally, by using Bluetooth wireless technology.
CommWarrior, which attacks Symbian Series 60 platform phones, is able to do this too, but in a critical evolution in phone viruses, now also has the ability to randomly send an MMS (multimedia messaging service) message to an infected phone's contacts list.
Users must download a file sent with the text in order to infect their phone.
This ability is similar to that seen in e-mail viruses, where the virus replicates by sending itself to e-mail addresses listed in the infected PC's address book. Users are much more likely to open these e-mails, as they often appear to have been sent by someone they know.
"The situation is not critical since we have not received a lot of reports from our customers," said F-Secure's Director for Mobile Operator Solutions, Antti Vihavainen. "However, CommWarrior creates unwanted billing for the owners of infected phones by sending MMS messages without user interaction."
"The phones can be easily protected by using common sense. None of today's mobile viruses can install themselves without the user accepting the standard security warnings," he added.
F-Secure is investigating why the virus, which appears to have come from Russia, is replicating slowly at present.
Monday, October 06, 2008
Malcolm Forbes
Monday, September 29, 2008
How Mrs Thatcher's (Conservative / Tory) sell-off went wrong
The Failure of Bradford & Bingley is the final nail in the coffin of one of Margaret Thatcher's most widely felt financial reforms. Its nationalisation marks the end for de-mutualised building societies, all of which have now been taken over or gone bust.
The Iron Lady introduced demutualisation in an 1986 Act, enabling building societies - owned by their members - to turn themselves into public companies. This allowed the likes of Northern Rock, Halifax , Abbey National (Santander) B&B better access to cheaper money; but they all either failed or were gradually snapped up by competitors with more spending power.
B&B demutualised in 2000 and built its business on risky buy-to-let and self-certified mortgage market - a decision which , with banks now super-cautious about lending money, has proved its downfall.
Taken from: The Metro Newspaper Mon Sept 29, 2008
Thursday, September 25, 2008
RE - US GOVT's POSSIBLE $3/4 TRILLION BAILOUT
Not being really clever at maths , but surely if the US Govt buys all tehse bad debts off the banks then the American Govt will then be stuffed by these bad debts and will have basically given the banks 3/4 trillion dollars?
Friday, September 19, 2008
Thursday, September 18, 2008
WHY MOZILLA FIREFOX IS THE SAFEST BROWSER
Firefox keeps your personal info personal and your online interests away from the bad guys.
READ WHY HERE
READ WHY HERE
RMT to go on strike on South Eastern Railways 22 - 23 Sept 2008
September 17, 2008
Drop the intimidation and negotiate, RMT tells South Eastern on eve of talks
September 17, 2008
SOUTH EASTERN Trains should drop its intimidation tactics against its workforce and negotiate settlements to the disputes that have led to 48-hour strike action being called for next Monday and Tuesday, Britain’s biggest rail union said today.
SEE MORE HERE
Drop the intimidation and negotiate, RMT tells South Eastern on eve of talks
September 17, 2008
SOUTH EASTERN Trains should drop its intimidation tactics against its workforce and negotiate settlements to the disputes that have led to 48-hour strike action being called for next Monday and Tuesday, Britain’s biggest rail union said today.
SEE MORE HERE
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Monday, September 15, 2008
WARNING : DR KATHY VILLIERS IS VERY BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH
TODAY i WENT TO MY DOCTORS AND HAD THE MISFORTUNE OF HAVING A NEW DOCTOR - SHE IS A WHITE SOUTH AFRICAN CALLED DR KATHY VILLIERS - PRESUMABLY SHE HAD TO LEAVE SOUTH AFRICA BECAUSE SHE WAS SO DISLIKED SHE HAD TO MOVE TO ANOTHER COUNTRY.
NEVER IN MY LIFE HAVE I BEEN SO BADLY TREATED BY ANYONE - SHE MADE ME FEEL SO SMALL AND UNIMPORTANT - SHE DIDNT EVEN HAVE MY MEDICAL NOTES WITH HER - SHE HAD TO ACCUSE ME OF ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN , I PRESUME TO SEE HOW I WOULD REACT AND SHE EVEN LEFT THE DOOR OPEN SO ALL THE OTHER PATIENTS COULD HEAR WHAT WAS BEING SAID.
IM REALLY DISAPPOINTED WITH MY OWN DOCTOR WITH THE WAY HE HAS LET SOME THIS INCOMPETENT WORK FOR HIM AND I WILL MAKE A POINT - IF I EVER GO BACK TO HIS SURGERY OF HAVING HER REMOVED IF NOT STRUCK OFF PERMANENTLY.
NEVER IN MY LIFE HAVE I BEEN SO BADLY TREATED BY ANYONE - SHE MADE ME FEEL SO SMALL AND UNIMPORTANT - SHE DIDNT EVEN HAVE MY MEDICAL NOTES WITH HER - SHE HAD TO ACCUSE ME OF ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN , I PRESUME TO SEE HOW I WOULD REACT AND SHE EVEN LEFT THE DOOR OPEN SO ALL THE OTHER PATIENTS COULD HEAR WHAT WAS BEING SAID.
IM REALLY DISAPPOINTED WITH MY OWN DOCTOR WITH THE WAY HE HAS LET SOME THIS INCOMPETENT WORK FOR HIM AND I WILL MAKE A POINT - IF I EVER GO BACK TO HIS SURGERY OF HAVING HER REMOVED IF NOT STRUCK OFF PERMANENTLY.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Wednesday, September 03, 2008
Bank of England Gives Lenders Estimated $354 Billion
Sept. 3 (Bloomberg) -- U.K. banks probably have tapped the Bank of England for more than 200 billion pounds ($354 billion) less than two months before its emergency funding plan is scheduled to end, according to UBS AG analysts.
The central bank's so-called special liquidity scheme, established in April and set to close in October, allows banks to swap mortgage-backed securities hurt by the credit squeeze for government bonds. Banks may face insolvency unless central bank Governor Mervyn King succeeds with his plan to put in place a new money-market system, UBS said.
``A permanent solution is needed,'' said the London-based analysts led by Alastair Ryan in a research note to clients dated Sept. 1. Otherwise ``U.K. banks will have perhaps 200 billion pounds of exploding funding'' to refinance within the next three years and would be forced to cut back lending and shrink assets. House prices could decline 40 percent without central bank help, Ryan said.
HBOS Plc, Britain's No. 1 mortgage lender, may be the biggest user of the U.K. central bank's bond plan, ahead of Lloyds TSB Group Plc, Barclays Plc and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc., Collins Stewart analysts led by Alex Potter in London wrote in a note to clients. HBOS relied on money markets to fund more than 50 percent of new mortgage lending before credit markets seized.
``We're not commenting on speculation about the usage of the scheme,'' a central bank official who declined to be identified in line with bank practice said in a telephone interview today. ``As has always been the case, there's no cap on the scheme. The size reflects its use.''
The U.K.'s Daily Telegraph newspaper reported the estimate of central bank funds used earlier today.
The central bank's so-called special liquidity scheme, established in April and set to close in October, allows banks to swap mortgage-backed securities hurt by the credit squeeze for government bonds. Banks may face insolvency unless central bank Governor Mervyn King succeeds with his plan to put in place a new money-market system, UBS said.
``A permanent solution is needed,'' said the London-based analysts led by Alastair Ryan in a research note to clients dated Sept. 1. Otherwise ``U.K. banks will have perhaps 200 billion pounds of exploding funding'' to refinance within the next three years and would be forced to cut back lending and shrink assets. House prices could decline 40 percent without central bank help, Ryan said.
HBOS Plc, Britain's No. 1 mortgage lender, may be the biggest user of the U.K. central bank's bond plan, ahead of Lloyds TSB Group Plc, Barclays Plc and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc., Collins Stewart analysts led by Alex Potter in London wrote in a note to clients. HBOS relied on money markets to fund more than 50 percent of new mortgage lending before credit markets seized.
``We're not commenting on speculation about the usage of the scheme,'' a central bank official who declined to be identified in line with bank practice said in a telephone interview today. ``As has always been the case, there's no cap on the scheme. The size reflects its use.''
The U.K.'s Daily Telegraph newspaper reported the estimate of central bank funds used earlier today.
Republican National Convention protest arrests tally nearly 300
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Police arrests tally nearly 300 following sometimes violent confrontations this week, and more protests were planned for Wednesday and Thursday, the final two days of the Republican National Convention.
Some protest organizers have promised to resume their often confrontational actions near where delegates are meeting in the Xcel Energy Center until the GOP convention ends its four-day run.
Police said Wednesday they had arrested 10 people throughout Tuesday, but they declined to offer specifics about each incident. Total arrests for the week were 294, including 137 felonies.
At least three of the arrests Tuesday came during a march against poverty. The march was tense but neither as widespread nor violent as events a day before, when nearly 300 people were arrested in numerous run-ins in downtown St. Paul.
Police estimated about 2,000 people took part in the poverty march, which lasted about three hours. It ended near the convention arena with police using tear gas and flash-bang grenades to disperse protesters they said were trying to get past security fences, said Tom Walsh, a St. Paul police spokesman.
The arrests Tuesday came a day after violence erupted following a largely peaceful anti-war march by some 10,000 people. Afterward, police blamed a splinter group of about 200 for harassing delegates, smashing windows, puncturing car tires, throwing bottles and starting at least one fire.
The RNC Welcoming Committee, a self-described anarchist group that has worked for months planning convention disruptions, claimed success in e-mails to its members and media. "The spectacle has been crashed!" read one.
That group wasn't officially connected with the organizers of either march.
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Kayak Man hopes he cant reach North Pole
Long-distance swimmer Lewis Pugh plans to kayak 1200km (745 miles) to the North Pole to raise awareness of how global warming has melted the ice sheet. The BBC's Jonah Fisher met him at his training camp in Cape Town, South Africa.
Lewis Pugh has spent his life swimming long distances. But after 20 minutes in the freezing water of the Arctic he decided that his future lay above the waves.
"Nobody has ever attempted to kayak to the pole before. In fact, it would have been impossible last year because it was frozen over," he said.
This year, for the first time, scientists predict that the North Pole could briefly be ice free and that has inspired Mr Pugh to try to find a way through.
On Saturday he is due to set off on the 1200km (745 mile) expedition from Norway to the North Pole - a journey expected to take between two and three weeks. A support ship will follow the kayak to provide Mr Pugh with food and respite from the brutal conditions.
"There's one side of me that desperately wants to get to the North Pole to be able to shake the lapels of world leaders to get them to understand what has happened there," he said.
"But then there's the other side of me that says I really hope I don't get there. I hope I fail because if I am able to get there we really are in deep trouble."
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Let's Hope Albert Einstein Got It Wrong....
Parasites Kill Off A Third of Britain's bees
Honeybees are being killed off in huge numbers by parasites, threatening the crucial pollination of crops.
A record one in three of the 240,000 hives in Britain did not survive the spring and the main cuplrit is the varroa mite.
The mites feed on the blood of honey bees weakening adults and deforming their young.
Other causes of the decline include bad weather and pesticides.
Honey bees pollinate about a third of our home grown food crops aand that , along with the honey they make, mesans they contribute £165m to the UK economy.
Albert Einstein once gave warning that if bees disappeared, man would have only four years left. - A book out this year - "A World without Bees" found that they are dying off across the globe. One cause, a virus called Colony Collapse Disorder, has hit 36% of US hives and spread to Italy, France and Germany.
The Govt. closed its consultation into honeybee health yesterday (28th August 2008) but most people invoved in the industry want more money spent on research, presumably before it's too late.
Computer Virus Infiltrates Laptops at International Space Station
A virus designed to swipe passwords from online gamers has inexplicably popped up in some laptop computers aboard the International Space Station.
The low-risk virus was detected on July 25, but did not infect the space station's command and control computers and poses no threat to the orbiting laboratory, NASA officials said.
"This is basically a nuisance," NASA spokesperson Kelly Humphries told SPACE.com from the agency's Johnson Space Center in Houston.
According to a NASA planning document obtained by SPACE.com, the worm was identified as W32.Gammima.AG. The California-based retail anti-virus software manufacturer Symantec describes it as a Windows-based worm which spreads by copying itself onto removable media. It is capable of stealing passwords for online games and is classified as a very low risk, according to Symantec's Web site.
Humphries said that while NASA security protocols prohibit discussing details of the virus and efforts to combat it, a search is under way to find out how it got on board the space station more than 200 miles above Earth.
"We'll do our best to track down how it got there and close that gateway," Humphries said. "This is not a frequent occurrence but we have had viruses that have made their way on board before."
New flash memory cards due to launch to the station aboard a Russian cargo ship next month have been screened for the virus, the NASA document stated. Not all of the 71 laptop computers currently aboard the station run Windows, and those that do and are vulnerable to viruses could be updated, it went on.
The space station is currently home to three astronauts: Russian cosmonaut commander Sergei Volkov, cosmonaut flight engineer Oleg Kononenko and NASA flight engineer Greg Chamitoff. Volkov and Kononenko are due to return to Earth in October, while Chamitoff is slated to stay until his replacement arrives during NASA's planned November space shuttle mission.
Copyright © 2008 Imaginova Corp. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Good Old George Bush and his democratic USA
We should now all be aware of the fact why George Bush kept quiet about China's human right's record at The Olympics - because he's borrowing millions of dollars from The Chinese to subsidise the Iraq War as basically The USA hasnt got the money to keep it going - So yes thats right hes borrowing money from a Communuist dictatorship to help Iraq become "a Democracy"
We also know that Mr Bush is best friends with his oil suppliers who in general operate Sharia Law in their countries as a form of controlling the population (also surely a form of dictatorship?)
And finally South Ossetia has already been recognised by Russia as an independent state from Georgia for several years already so why all of a sudden is now trying to make it look as though this had never happened before and that its already Russia's fault?
Hey but what can i say about democracy? - I live in a country where our current Prime Minister took over from Tony Blair without any vote and where Gordon Brown seems to bringing home the troops, from Iraq, just in time for his First General Election?
We also know that Mr Bush is best friends with his oil suppliers who in general operate Sharia Law in their countries as a form of controlling the population (also surely a form of dictatorship?)
And finally South Ossetia has already been recognised by Russia as an independent state from Georgia for several years already so why all of a sudden is now trying to make it look as though this had never happened before and that its already Russia's fault?
Hey but what can i say about democracy? - I live in a country where our current Prime Minister took over from Tony Blair without any vote and where Gordon Brown seems to bringing home the troops, from Iraq, just in time for his First General Election?
Monday, August 25, 2008
WHY I CHANGED MY POWER SUPPLIER FIRST FROM BRITISH GAS , THEN EON AND NOW ATLANTIC
IT ALL STARTED THREE MONTHS AGO...
... when I received a letter from British Gas demanding that i phone them up to arrange for a "Safety Inspector " to come and inspect my meter as it hadnt been done for three years and as a result it would by law obtain a court warrant if I didnt phone their customer service team and arrange it.
I therefore did this and was told that an inspector would come to my flat on a particular date in the morning - I asked my father to come to the flat as obviously I would be at work at the time and there was no way I could take time off work myself.
So my dad very generously waited in my flat the whole morning and guess what - NO ONE TURNED UP!!!
I phoned British Gas and asked them why no one had come to the appointment as had been arranged - A Customer Service Representative told me that they had no record of me even phoning to arrange the appointment and then he told me that i should'nt be phoning them as it was a different department who would be dealing with it - I asked why the phone number on the letter was the same as the one I was speaking to him on and he was unable to answer me further...
Seeing that I wasn't getting anywhere very fast I immediately phoned up Eon, who recently took over PowerGen , who my father had turned to after he had also fallen out with British Gas - First of all they put me on The Age Concern Tariff (very interesting as I'm only 36!!!!) BUT WHATS EVEN WORSE IS THAT TWO MONTHS AFTER THEY PROMISED ME THAT I WOULD NO LONGER BE A CUSTOMER OF BRITISH GAS I STILL AM!!!
How Did I find this out???
By receiving a final refund cheque from British Gas for my electricity - OK So this means that British Gas are no longer my supplier of electricity? But according to them they are still my supplier of Gas - NOT ACCORDING TO EON - ACCORDING TO THE CUSTOMER SERVICE TEAM AT EON EON NOW SUPPLY MY GAS BUT NOT AS OF YET MY ELECTRICITY
CONFUSED ?!!!
I WAS AND EVEN THOUGH I SPENT OVER TEN MINUTES TRYING TO EXPLAIN THIS TO THE AIR HEAD CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT EON SHE KEPT ON SAYING THE OPPOSITE TO WHAT I WAS TELLING HER BRITISH GAS HAD TOLD ME!!!!
Seeing I had already sent Eon an email immediately i received the final electricity refund from British Gas I got on the phone again and found out that apparently even though all of the Power Companies in The United Kingdom seem to be running an Oligopoly Atlantic Energy (well actually thats only a trading name of Scottish & Southern Electricity) had a rating of 5 out of 5 for Customer Service
Please if someone knows a company who is actually not part of the con or crap at customer service - not going to invest in Nuclear Power Stations but they'll give you Nectar Points as a bribe if you sign up with them (Sainsburys Energy or EDF as they actually are) let me know !!!!
HEY BUT AT LEAST THEYRE ALLOWED TO BUILD NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS IN THE UK - IN IRAN THEY GET THREATENED WITH SANCTIONS AND INVASION IF THEY DO THIS!!
... when I received a letter from British Gas demanding that i phone them up to arrange for a "Safety Inspector " to come and inspect my meter as it hadnt been done for three years and as a result it would by law obtain a court warrant if I didnt phone their customer service team and arrange it.
I therefore did this and was told that an inspector would come to my flat on a particular date in the morning - I asked my father to come to the flat as obviously I would be at work at the time and there was no way I could take time off work myself.
So my dad very generously waited in my flat the whole morning and guess what - NO ONE TURNED UP!!!
I phoned British Gas and asked them why no one had come to the appointment as had been arranged - A Customer Service Representative told me that they had no record of me even phoning to arrange the appointment and then he told me that i should'nt be phoning them as it was a different department who would be dealing with it - I asked why the phone number on the letter was the same as the one I was speaking to him on and he was unable to answer me further...
Seeing that I wasn't getting anywhere very fast I immediately phoned up Eon, who recently took over PowerGen , who my father had turned to after he had also fallen out with British Gas - First of all they put me on The Age Concern Tariff (very interesting as I'm only 36!!!!) BUT WHATS EVEN WORSE IS THAT TWO MONTHS AFTER THEY PROMISED ME THAT I WOULD NO LONGER BE A CUSTOMER OF BRITISH GAS I STILL AM!!!
How Did I find this out???
By receiving a final refund cheque from British Gas for my electricity - OK So this means that British Gas are no longer my supplier of electricity? But according to them they are still my supplier of Gas - NOT ACCORDING TO EON - ACCORDING TO THE CUSTOMER SERVICE TEAM AT EON EON NOW SUPPLY MY GAS BUT NOT AS OF YET MY ELECTRICITY
CONFUSED ?!!!
I WAS AND EVEN THOUGH I SPENT OVER TEN MINUTES TRYING TO EXPLAIN THIS TO THE AIR HEAD CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT EON SHE KEPT ON SAYING THE OPPOSITE TO WHAT I WAS TELLING HER BRITISH GAS HAD TOLD ME!!!!
Seeing I had already sent Eon an email immediately i received the final electricity refund from British Gas I got on the phone again and found out that apparently even though all of the Power Companies in The United Kingdom seem to be running an Oligopoly Atlantic Energy (well actually thats only a trading name of Scottish & Southern Electricity) had a rating of 5 out of 5 for Customer Service
Please if someone knows a company who is actually not part of the con or crap at customer service - not going to invest in Nuclear Power Stations but they'll give you Nectar Points as a bribe if you sign up with them (Sainsburys Energy or EDF as they actually are) let me know !!!!
HEY BUT AT LEAST THEYRE ALLOWED TO BUILD NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS IN THE UK - IN IRAN THEY GET THREATENED WITH SANCTIONS AND INVASION IF THEY DO THIS!!
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Financial Times Article proves Georgia Started War With Russia
Jan Cienski
Financial Times
August 21, 2008
Georgia did not believe Russia would respond to its offensive in South Ossetia and was completely unprepared for the counter-attack, the deputy defence minister has admitted.
Batu Kutelia told the Financial Times that Georgia had made the decision to seize the South Ossetian capital of Tskhinvali despite the fact that its forces did not have enough anti-tank and air defences to protect themselves against the possibility of serious resistance.
“Unfortunately, we attached a low priority to this,” he said, sitting at a desk with the flags of Georgia and Nato (to which Georgia does not belong) crossed behind him. “We did not prepare for this kind of eventuality.”
The Georgian military felt there was only a low probability of a massive Russian counter-attack, despite the bloody way in which Russia destroyed Chechnya, on the other side of the Caucasus mountains, in two wars during the 1990s and the fact that separatists in South Ossetia and Abkhazia had Russian backing.
Georgian forces were unprepared when the Russian counter-strike came, Mr Kutelia said. “I didn’t think it likely that a member of the UN Security Council and the OSCE would react like this,” Mr Kutelia said.
Financial Times
August 21, 2008
Georgia did not believe Russia would respond to its offensive in South Ossetia and was completely unprepared for the counter-attack, the deputy defence minister has admitted.
Batu Kutelia told the Financial Times that Georgia had made the decision to seize the South Ossetian capital of Tskhinvali despite the fact that its forces did not have enough anti-tank and air defences to protect themselves against the possibility of serious resistance.
“Unfortunately, we attached a low priority to this,” he said, sitting at a desk with the flags of Georgia and Nato (to which Georgia does not belong) crossed behind him. “We did not prepare for this kind of eventuality.”
The Georgian military felt there was only a low probability of a massive Russian counter-attack, despite the bloody way in which Russia destroyed Chechnya, on the other side of the Caucasus mountains, in two wars during the 1990s and the fact that separatists in South Ossetia and Abkhazia had Russian backing.
Georgian forces were unprepared when the Russian counter-strike came, Mr Kutelia said. “I didn’t think it likely that a member of the UN Security Council and the OSCE would react like this,” Mr Kutelia said.
Friday, August 15, 2008
Two arrested in China over pro-Tibet protest
Beijing:Two foreign activists were arrested this morning (Fri Aug 15th 2008) this morning after climbing China's state-owned television headquarters near the main Olympic venue and erecting a big "Free Tibet" banner. The protesters , one Briton and one Australian, were led away by police and were expected to be deported from China. Witnesses said that about six people were involved in the demonstration.
Taken from The Times Fri Aug 15th 2008
On Channel Four News yesterday they reported about the "Protest Parks" that had been set up especially for the Olympics - Apparently they do exist but noone is there as all people who have applied have been refused admittance and then harrassed by police ....
Taken from The Times Fri Aug 15th 2008
On Channel Four News yesterday they reported about the "Protest Parks" that had been set up especially for the Olympics - Apparently they do exist but noone is there as all people who have applied have been refused admittance and then harrassed by police ....
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Friday, August 08, 2008
Flu pandemic tops risk register
Flooding is among the hazards highlighted in the register
A flu pandemic is the gravest threat to UK security as it could claim up to 750,000 lives, according to a new National Risk Register.
The document, commissioned by the prime minister, aims to publicly set out the potential impact of a range of different risks for the first time.
Other issues examined include terrorism and flooding.
The information had been kept secret up until now. The register will be updated annually by the Cabinet Office.
The report offers an insight into the various dangers faced by the UK and how they are viewed by government advisors.
BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner said that while officials insist the register was not intended to rank dangers in any kind of priority, it is clear that pandemic flu emerges as the gravest threat to national security.
'Mature conversation'
According to the report, while terrorist attacks are the most likely threat, a flu pandemic is overdue and could claim 50,000 - 750,000 lives.
Ian Kearns, who is deputy chair of think tank IPPR's security commission, praised the government for trying to stimulate a "mature conversation" with the public and businesses on the risks facing the UK.
He said the register was particularly aimed at encouraging public and private organisations to think about their response to major emergencies.
"You might want to ask the question, for example, what happens if many of our heavy goods vehicle drivers fell victim to that influenza and weren't able to perform their jobs?
"Do we have enough back-up to be able, for example, to deliver food to the supermarkets?" he said on BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
"These kinds of questions about resilience of supply chains and so on; how essential workers might be affected. These are the kind of things that public and private sector organisations need to think about."
Cyber attacks
The launch of the register, which was commissioned in March, follows the launch of the National Security Strategy, in the same month.
On that occasion, the prime minister said the number of security service staff would rise to 4,000 and that there would be new moves to secure the UK against cyber-attacks.
He also said there would be a 1,000-strong civilian task-force to be sent to troubled areas around the world.
As part of the National Security Strategy, four regional counter-terrorism units and four regional intelligence units would be set up to help the police.
Friday, August 01, 2008
28 Days Later - The Aftermath (Book Synposis)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
28 Days Later: The Aftermath
Cover of 28 Days Later: The Aftermath
Publisher Fox Atomic Comics
Date April 3, 2007
Creative team
Writer(s) Steve Niles
Artist(s) Cover:
Tim Bradstreet
Stories 1 & 4:
Dennis Calero
Story 2:
Diego Olmos (Pencils)
Ken Branch (Inks)
Story 3:
Nat Jones
Colorist(s) Dennis Calero
28 Days Later: The Aftermath is a graphic novel continuation of the hit film 28 Days Later written by Steve Niles and distributed by Fox Atomic Comics. It was released on April 3, 2007.
The book bridges the gap between the original film and its sequel 28 Weeks Later. It explores four interconnecting stories and delves deeper into the development of the Rage virus, the battle for survival that ensued once it was unleashed in London, and what it finally took to restore order in the ravaged city.
28 Days Later: The Aftermath was the first graphic novel released by Fox Atomic Comics.
Contents
[hide]
* 1 Plot
o 1.1 Stage 1: Development
o 1.2 Stage 2: Outbreak
o 1.3 Stage 3: Decimation
o 1.4 Stage 4: Quarantine
* 2 See also
* 3 External links
[edit] Plot
Aftermath is divided into four stories ranging in setting from shortly before the outbreak to several months afterward. The first three stories each follow separate groups or individuals; the fourth story brings the survivors of these stories together for their ultimate fate.
[edit] Stage 1: Development
The first stage begins an unknown amount of time before the initial outbreak. It opens in parallel fashion to 28 Days Later with a montage of violent acts, which are soon revealed to be video footage on a bank of television screens—in this case, CCTV footage of crimes which had taken place in London the previous night. Two scientists named Clive and Warren are attempting to develop an inhibitor which can be used to control aggressive impulses in humans.
Warren is able to secure a violent criminal as a human test subject by bribing a police captain. When the subject proves uncontrollable, Warren and Clive are forced to kill him and hide his body. Despite his misgivings, Clive is now irrevocably tied to the project.
Warren decides that the only feasible means of widely disseminating their inhibitor is through the use of a contagion. He genetically modifies the Ebola virus to carry the inhibitor, against Clive's strong objections. Weeks later, however, the virus has mutated, reversing the inhibitor's effect—the Rage virus has been born. Frustrated, Warren lashes out at Clive for making a snide comment, and Clive quits on the spot. Later, he makes a call from a public telephone to an eco-terrorist group called the Animal Freedom Front, and then shoots himself in the head. This gives the reader an insight of how infection started and brought the devastation to Britain.
The story then shifts to Warren who is sitting at his desk talking to an unknown person on the telephone. Warren informs him that the inhibitor has had a reverse effect. The man enlightens Warren that this could have "other applications" when the telephone suddenly cuts out. Warren at this moment hears a strange noise coming from down the hall and seems distressed by it. He approaches a door noticing it was left open. Upon entering the door, Warren is abruptly ambushed by an ape who vomits in his face infecting him with "Rage".
[edit] Stage 2: Outbreak
The second story begins the day after the break-in at the laboratory. A family of five is picnicking at a park in Cambridge, bickering over trivial things. Youngest son Liam sees a chimpanzee in a tree; the ape assaults him and vomits blood in his face. The boy's father, Roger, subdues and kills the animal. A team of paramedics happens to be nearby, attending to a bicyclist with a minor injury. They rush to the aid of the boy and load him into their ambulance, instructing the family to follow in their own vehicle as they rush the child to a hospital in London. The family trailing the ambulance witness scenes of carnage along the way; the infection precedes them.
Inevitably, Liam becomes infected and infects the two paramedics riding with him. When the driver opens the ambulance's back doors, Liam and the paramedics assault him, and Liam's family realizes that something is terribly wrong.
Days later, the four surviving family members are hiding out in a barricaded dwelling in London. The news on the radio is dire, but the signal cuts to static. Elder son Sid suggests they try to escape to safety up the Thames. They reach Westminster Bridge with Infected hot on their trail. Parents Roger and Barb urge their children to jump down to the abandoned, but functional, motorboats floating below, promising to follow after. Instead, they remain on the bridge for a last stand, allowing Sid and Sophie to escape upriver undetected. John then gets infected...
[edit] Stage 3: Decimation
The third story takes place 29 to 32 days after the initial outbreak—roughly the same time as the bulk of 28 Days Later. A lone survivor named Hugh, decked out in a mishmash of protective clothing, has inherited London, and he spends his days hunting the Infected with a machete and an SA80 rifle he looted from a military blockade.
The comic begins with an infected attacking a person in silhouette only to find out it is a mannequin doused with perfume. This confirms that the Infected use their sense of smell to track humans and distinguish them from the horde. Among other things, trace amounts of chemical products such as shampoo and perfumes seem to attract the Infected.
Before Hugh can gloat, however, he is attacked by another survivor wearing SWAT gear and a hockey mask. Evading the assailant's hail of fire, Hugh makes for safety and plans to eliminate this apparent threat. Stocking up on ammunition (and perfume), Hugh sets out for the hunt.
After being ambushed by Hugh, the other survivor retreats to his vehicle—a commandeered military transport. Hugh douses the vehicle with about a gallon of perfume from his rooftop perch, and before the other survivor can question the meaning of the act, he is set upon by the horde, who infect him before tearing him apart. Hugh shoots the vehicle until he ignites its petrol tank, killing a large number of Infected. Behind him, though, he hears an unfamiliar sound and turns to see several US Navy F-14 Tomcats making a low pass over central London.
[edit] Stage 4: Quarantine
The final story takes place 38 to 42 days after the initial infection. Sid and his sister Sophie have reached a refugee center and been taken in. Sophie now volunteers at the makeshift hospital, where she meets a new arrival brought in from one of the city hospitals. It is Clive, who has survived his suicide attempt. He initially attempts to explain his involvement directly, but quickly decides to hide his responsibility. Instead, he explains what he can do about the virus, revealing only that he is a scientist himself.
Sid, meanwhile, becomes friends with another new arrival—Hugh. Hugh initially refused to be brought to the camp and he explains his misgivings to Sid. Eventually, Hugh is able to convince Sid, Sophie, and Clive that the military has ulterior motives and that they must escape. They steal some uniforms and weapons and they head for the hills, but they are detected. Sid and Hugh volunteer to remain behind to hold off the soldiers following them; they are both killed in a fusillade of gunfire.
Higher up the hill, Clive stops Sophie and reveals that he was on the team which developed the virus that killed her family and warns that it could possibly mutate again. He tries to ask her to help him find a way to make things right. Instead, Sophie kisses him, then shoots him in the head. Smiling, she drops her pistol, and allows a sniper aboard the pursuit helicopter to kill her with a rifle shot through the head.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)